|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

IN BRIEF

[14.04.2008] Timisoara : TV campaign

Regional television TVR Timisoara is broadcasting the campaign "Give value to your choices and... Plus ...

SEARCH ENGINE

MSC: the Multipartite Social Contract

The Multipartite Social Contract is a new approach to combat social exclusion which integrates various dimensions of inclusion (socialsupport, access to employment, financial resources, consumption, social ties,etc.). It creates mutual commitment between social inclusion organizationsalongside the beneficiaries themselves, in a contract where complementarities, rolesand responsibilities are defined, followed and evaluated by all participants.

The MSC is based on the Council of Europe's Social Cohesion Strategy including society'sresponsibility for the well-being of all. It was designed and launched within theDialogue Platform on Ethical and Solidarity-based Initiatives and the IRIS inter-network.

The new elements of this concept are:
- A partnership relationship (beneficiary partners) rather than assistance;
- The commitment of all partners to shared objectives of social inclusion;
- A citizen dimension in social inclusion with the responsible consumption and ethicalfinance.

News of the Multiparty Social Contract (MSC)

On September 28, 2007 tookplace the third evaluation meeting of the Multiparty Social Contract, a pilot projecttested in Strasbourg with people in excessive debt situations and which joins institutional/ associative partners and beneficiary partners in a common commitment forsocial inclusion.

Four evaluation meetings were planned for the concept's first experimentation, foreach several objectives:
- Evaluate the MSC's contribution to well being using indicators createdtogether, and updating those indicators;
- Evaluate the project in general and think of its evolution and improvement;
- Evaluate the reproducibility of the MSC model and its capacity to betransferred and applied in other regions or with other target groups.

The meeting's first part, carried out with the beneficiary partners alone,started with a common reading of the well being criteria stated during thefirst evaluation meeting and updated during the second. The need to updatecriteria started an impassioned debate where participants expressed theirdissatisfaction with legal barriers and imperatives. "Today we feel lost, we donot know what to do, it is a disaster" says one of them; others protest againstinjustice of law stating differences between regions or the "Banque de France"system; other voices protest against the fact that children undergo parents' problems:the child of one of the partners could not benefit from the offer "driving licensefor one euro per day" because of the family's debt situation, fact whichcontributes to increase the feeling of exclusion.
Partners also denounced certain absurd obligations, like the case of a personsuffering from cancer who must carry out training courses to continue receivingsocial security allowances.
"The State also has debts, why not ask it to live, like us, with 400 Euros permonth?!?" asked one of the beneficiary partners.

We then evaluated the MSC's contribution to well being.
If the beneficiary partners initially expressed doubts and were critical aboutthe MSC's real contribution to debts reduction (only looking at the "concrete"consequence of the concept), thinking of each criterion made them realize the MSC'scontribution in terms of organization, dialogue and exchange, access toconsumption, a better budget management and the improvement of their well beingin general.

The second part of the evaluation, this time with all the partners of thecontract (beneficiary and institutional), started with updating inscriptions tothe various workshops among which:
- Classification: order in papers and easy ways for better defending oneself;
- Cooking (with shared meal);
- Water and energy Saving;
- Group meetings with Humani Psy;

Etc.
The discussion showed the beneficiary partners' strong implication and the activities'contribution to the well being of each one.

Beneficiary partners also expressed their wish to a dialogue with thegovernment and the Bank of France in order to find concrete solutions to debts.

The bank of France manager, who was invited to themeeting but could not be present, invites all MSC participants to visit thebank and ensures his participation in the next (and last) evaluation meeting.
Besides the project's presentation at the Trento seminar (November) and beforethe European governments (December), it was decided to invite one or moredeputies to the next meeting.

A reserve however was issued on the effort invested in the MSC whereas society continuesto produce excessive debt situations: proposals were made in this direction toimply other partners in the MSC like the Bank of France, or to create jobs forexample with the AMAP system.

Various questions were also raised: the search for a job (ENSIE proposes a listof social integration enterprises), housing and high rent (the AMAP representativeproposes to look at co-operative housing as a possible solution), challengingthe political world and banking institutions (by trying to adapt legislationand banking products to indebted people)...
it was also clear that education actions are necessary: learning how to  choose financial products as well as food orother everyday consumption goods.


Finally, in order to have a more political aspect for the next meeting (November23), it was decided to invite French deputies and representatives of the 5largest French co-operative banks.

 

EVENT

[25-26.04.2008] IFAT : 4th French Fair Trade Forum

Plus ...

[13-16.05.2008] ENSIE : Social economy days

Plus ...

[5-6.06.2008] INAISE : The World Social Finance Summit 2008 (Quebec)

Plus ...

[01.01.2008] Action Consommation joins ASECO

Plus ...

MEMBERS

OUR PARTNERS